-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
CMI 5 Working Group Meeting Minutes – January 21st
Bill McDonald edited this page Jan 28, 2022
·
4 revisions
cmi5 Working Group Meeting Minutes – January 21st
Attendees
- Bill McDonald (Working Group Leader)
- Andy Johnson (ADL)
- Florian Tolk (ADL)
- Henry Ryng (InXSOL)
- George Vilches (Rustici Software)
- Brian Miller (Rustici Software)
- Matt Westover (ECZ & Company)
- Chetan Sachdev()
- Russ Engoran ()
- Carsten König (TUTORize GmbH)
- Christopher Thompson (Medcom, Inc.)
- Martin Koob (VideoLinkWell)
Notes
The group continued its discussion reviewing derived testing requirements against the cmi5 spec to determine if related spec changes are necessary.
- Review Derived Requirements (CATAPULT JSON)
- Determine if spec corrections/clarifications/defects are required
- Add Reference to Testing Requirements in spec
The group reviewed the CATAPULT derived requirements JSON - See Excel Spreadsheet
Topics/Questions raised during the review:
- Why does spec not specifically list requirements for "allowed statements"?
- Answer: the spec has requirements for "cmi5 allowed statements" then defines explicit requirement for for "cmi5 defined" statements
- Should the LMS provide an Statement ID for LMS generated statements ? (Abandoned, Waived, Satisfied, etc.)
- Why are statement ID’s required? (If the LRS will provide anyway if omitted) What is the best/common practice ?
- Blank lines in the Derived Requirements were not implemented (for various reasons unable to define tests)
All Previous cmi5 Meeting Minutes
https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/wiki
cmi5 on GitHub:
http://aicc.github.io/CMI-5_Spec_Current/