-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
2018.07.11 Editors Meeting
https://duraspace.zoom.us/my/fedora
- Andrew Hankinson (Bodleian Libraries)*
- Simeon Warner (Cornell)
- Julian Morley (Stanford)
- Neil Jefferies (Bodleian Libraries)
- Rosalyn Metz (Emory)
- Andrew Woods (DuraSpace)
(* indicates the notetaker)
- Catch-up on September Meeting
- Decouple object from storage location (Issue #22)
- What is the granularity of distributing OCFL elements?
- Storage root?
- OCFL object?
- Object version?
- file / datastream?
- What is the granularity of distributing OCFL elements?
- "New Inventory Structure" - getting early agreement on this seems critical
- What is our model?
- Object is a bag?
- Version is a bag?
- Community Meeting
- We should be sending out meeting information at least a week in advance
- Next meeting is July 20th. Agenda topics?
- Each to claim a GitHub Issue
Andrew -- opened with a note on the September meeting and an update on the planning. All seems to be going well.
Agenda item 1: decided that an object has to have a local representation we have decided to defer the implementation of remote storage for objects. All objects will have object-local representations of the versions.
Manifests will always look the same; a sidecar file would tell where a remote version could be fetched, and the manifests will always appear as though there was object-local storage.
Agenda item 2: Point 1: In any given version dir. there is an inventory file & another one w/ checksum (.sha512). At the object level there are two files that are identical to the most recent version. The entry for previous inventory.jsonld files do not appear in subsequent inventory entries, since the inventory is the inventory of the object, not object + OCFL metadata.
Simeon closed issue #7 and deferred to issue #29.
Community / Community Call Simeon and Rosy are putting together a proposal for Samvera Connect
An agenda was drafted for the next community call.
- ...